Main Article Content

Abstract

 


Abstract: the study is aimed at analyzing the influence of promotions, prices, distribution and products on the decision to purchase the pakumas' herbal drug products in the flood city. 385 respondents get a sample taken, based on cochran formula (sugiyono, 2018:148). Research instruments through validity and religious tests and classic assumption tests involving normality, heterosity, multicolitarianism. Data analysis techniques using linear regression with the help of SPSS computer programs


This research suggests, that:



  1. Promotion (x1), price (x2) distribution (x3) and product (x4) simultaneously significantly affected the decision to purchase (y) the pakumas herbal remedy product in the flood city

  2. Promotion (x1), price (x2), distribution and products (x4) in a partial way significantly affected the decision to purchase (y) the herbal products of mas nails in the city of banjarmasin.

  3. Product (x1) is dominant in importance to the mampurchase (y) needle herbal product in the flood city. This is proven with a beta variable product product of 0.479 greater than promotional, price and distribution variables.


 Keywords: promotion, price, distribution, product and decision to buy.

Article Details

References

  1. Ardiyansyah, R., & Sugiharto, S. (2012). Analisis Pengaruh Bauran Pemasaran Terhadap Minat Beli Konsumen Di Puspo Agro.. JurusanManajemen Pemasaran,
  2. Universitas Kristen Petra, 1–8
  3. Alma, Buchari. 2005. Manajemen
  4. Pemasaran Dan Pemasaran Jasa.
  5. Bandung : CV Alfabeta
  6. Deliya, Mitul M dan MR Bhavesh J Parmar, M, 2012. Role of Pakackaging
  7. on Consumer Buying Behavioe. Global Journal of Management
  8. and business Research, vol.12 No.10.
  9. Gitosudarmo, Indriyo. 1994. Manajemen Pemasaran. Edisi Pertama. BPFE Yogyakarta.
  10. Hill, Liz dan Terry O’Sullivan. 2004. Foundation Marketing. Third Edition.
  11. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  12. Hutapea, R. C. D., & Herman, H. (2020). Pengaruh Marketing Mix Terhadap Minat Beli Konsumen Pada Pt . Capella Dinamik. 3 (September), 465–476.
  13. Kotler Philip dan Gary Armstrong. 2008. Prinsip – Prinsip Pemasaraan. Edisi 12 Jilid 1, Cetakan Kelima. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta
  14. Kotler Philip dan Kevin Lane Keller, 2009. Manajemen Pemasaran. Edisi
  15. 13 Jilid 1, Cetakan Kelima.
  16. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta
  17. Kotler Philip dan Kevin Lane Keller. 2012. Marketing Management. Fourteen Edition, Person Education Limited, England.
  18. Marendra, I. G. (2018). Pengaruh Bauran Pemasaran (Produk, Harga, Lokasi Dan Promosi) Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen Di Minimarket (Alfamart Atau Indomaret). 1(3), 2598–2823.
  19. Setyawan, A. A., Ekasari, R., & Dewi, N. N. (2020). Pengaruh produk, harga, promosi terhadap minat beli konsumen lele di sidoarjo. Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis UMAHA, 3(1), 227
  20. Sanyal, S., N. & Datta, S., J. (2011) "The effect of perceived quality on brand equity: an empirical study on generic drugs", Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 23 Issue: 5, pp.604-625.
  21. Sunardi, Ibrahim, Tain. (2016). Analysis The Effect of Marketing Mix In Purch Decision of Growing Up Milk on Three Socio-Economic Classes in Malang.
  22. Agricultural SocioEconomics Journal.
  23. Vol. XVI, 87-96.
  24. Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi
  25. (Mixed Methods). Jakarta: CV Alfabeta.
  26. Tjiptono, Fandy. 2012. Service Manajemen, Mewujudkan Layanan Prima. Yogyakarta. CV Andi Offset.
  27. .
  28. Tjiptono, 2012. Pemasaran. Yogyakarta : CV Andi Offset
  29. Tatik Suryani, 2013. Perilaku Konsumen di Era Internet. Yogyakarta. Graha Ilmu.
  30. Widyaningrum, N. A. (2017). Dampak Bauran Pemasaran Terhadap Minat
  31. Beli Konsumen Pada Produk Crispy Rice Crackers. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Start-Up Bisnis, 1(6), 635–641.
  32. Zeithaml, Vlarie A & Bitner, Mary J. (1996). Service Marketing: Integrating
  33. Customer Focus Across The Firm. USA: The McGraw Hill Companies.